So, I just caught the last twenty minutes of “Elmer Gantry” (1960) on TCM, and I was reminded of just how terribly overacted that whole movie was. Like, terribly. But, it totally works. Before I explain why, I think it best to give a brief refresher of the plot and to let you know that it’s based on a novel by Sinclair Lewis, so approach accordingly.
Elmer Gantry, played (overplayed?) by Burt Lancaster, is a yucky traveling salesman with so much charm it hurts. He crosses paths with an evangelist, Sister Sharon Falconer (Jean Simmons). Elmer convinces Sharon that he is precisely what her roadshow needs, and becomes the main evangelical attraction. In the meantime, Lulu Bains, a prostitute Elmer knew before he began traveling with Sharon, catches up with him and causes issue. (Lulu is played by Shirley Jones, and if you’re a “The Music Man” aficionado like I am, you’ll have to radically change your perceptions of her as an actress. Holy cow, what a 180). The movie ends with a catastrophe that Elmer must work to reconcile.
As you can imagine, a movie centered on two evangelists is full of a lot of hell fire and damnation. Lancaster and Simmons play to all of the stereotypes – and boy do they play into it good: the yelling, the invocation of God, the eyes-closing, the kindness so extreme it seems fake, etc. Fundamentally, these performances should be so revolting to me that I have to quit watching. As a general rule, I try to avoid bad acting, particularly of the overacting variety. But, I just can’t. It works so well in a weird way. The evangelism the movie focuses on is in and of itself sort of overacted, so this overacting seems natural and necessary. In fact, Lancaster won Best Actor and Jones won Best Supporting Actress.
But, while I’m on the subject of “Elmer Gantry” I’ve got to say the scene in which Elmer does the running slide while preaching is one of my favorites of all time. (If you’ve seen the movie, you know exactly what I’m talking about. If you haven’t, you’d better go watch it so you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about). It’s so indicative of Elmer’s character as well as the culture of the Revivalist movement. So great. Just a really good cinematic choice.